EDC 102 School Data - 2011


Ella Risk School (Grades K through 5)
Name of Student: Jacob Ricci


Use the sites discussed in class to (1) assemble information about your school and (2) write one or more paragraphs for each type of information that you find.You should be able to combine these paragraphs, along with an introduction and conclusion to create a free standing, coherent, evidence-based description of your school.

Be sure that each of your paragraphs includes:
  • A strong topic sentence.
  • An explanation of why the data you chose to cite relates to the subject you are addressing, e.g. you should state why you feel that the student/teacher ratio informs your judgement about the school's ability to provide high quality teaching. These sentences should be based on the definitions of some of these measures on the InfoWorks site, but can also include your own reasoning about the subject.
  • Multiple pieces of specific data to support your claim. Each measure should include a comparison so tat the reader can judge whether the value is relatively high or low.
  • Include the students' view of the school when possible.


Note: Tables are not provided because it is possible to just copy and paste the tables from the Infoworks site directly in this page!

Useful Sources:



School Demographics and Geographical Location



Summary Paragraph(s)



Student Achievement



Information Reported By Schools

NECAP Assessments
% Proficient School
% Proficient State

3rd Grade Math 2010-11
29%
62%

3rd Grade Reading 2010-11
42%
71%

4th Grade Math 2010-11
59%
63%

4th Grade Reading 2010-11
66%
68%

4th Grade Science 2010-11
20%
43%

5th Grade Math 2010-11
too few data
62%

5th Grade Reading 2010-11
too few data
73%

5th Grade Writing 2010-11
too few data
59%


Information Reported By Students



AYP Report Card


  • Number of Target Areas Evaluated: 25
  • Number of Targets Met: 22
  • Areas that need improvement:

Summary Paragraph(s)



For the last five years, the Ella Risk School has not met adequate yearly progress. The school has failed repeatedly, in multiple areas. The NECAP scores reflect this, with all of them below the state average, some by as much as 30%. The math scores are consistently low, third grade being at only 29% proficient, while fourth grade is at 59% proficient. There is not even enough data to judge the fifth grade on any subjects, math, reading nor writing. The reading scores are better, at 42% for the third grade and 66% for the fourth grade. Unfortunately, fourth grade science is lacking at only 20% proficient. The state averages for these categories are significantly higher, and highlight a clear problem area in the state as far as public education is concerned. This failure cannot be blamed on the teachers though.


Teaching



Information Reported By Schools:

Qualifications and Teacher-Student Ratio
This School
Statewide
Teachers with Emergency Certification 2010-11
0%
1%
Not High Qualified Teachers 2010-11
0%
3%
Teacher-Student Ratio 2010-11
1:9
1:11

Information Reported by Students



Summary Paragraph(s)

The teachers at Ella Risk are in no way less qualified or of lower quality than other teachers. Ella Risk actually has no teachers with Emergency Certification, and no Not High Qualified teachers. While this does not mean that every teacher at Ella Risk is a great teacher, it does mean that every teacher is qualified to teach. Adding to the quality of education available is the teacher-student ration, which is at 1 teacher for every 9 students, a ratio well suited for learning and one which favors closer teacher-student contact. It is apparent that the low performance of the school is not due to a plethora of unqualified teachers nor is it to blame on a lack of teacher-student interactions (as far as the data shows). Clearly, the issues rest somewhere else.

Family,Community, and Home Life



Information Reported By Schools:

Student Characteristics (2010-2011)
This School
Statewide
View Details
Student Eligibility for Subsidized Lunch
88%
43%
view details
view details

Students from Various Racial/Ethnic Backgrounds


view details
view details

Students Receiving ESL/Bilingual Education Services
19%
5%
view details
view details

Students Receiving Special Education Services
19%
16%


Information Reported by Students



Summary Paragraph(s)

Opposite the teachers on the equation of education are the students. The student population of Ella Risk is diverse and comes from a diverse home life. Of the 414 students at Ella Risk, 72% are Hispanic, 26% are White, and of the remaining 2%, half are Multicultural and the other half are African American. With more than 70% of the population Hispanic, the question of language is raised. In Ella Risk, 19% of the students are receiving bilingual education services. This most certainly plays a role in the low reading and writing NECAP scores. It is also important to note that 19% of students are receiving special education services. This most certainly affects the test scores in a negative way.
Another element which impacts the overall education of students at Ella Risk is economics. 88% of the student body is eligible for subsidized lunch. This is a substantial portion of the school and representative of the economic status of much of Central Falls. Economic standing has been proven to be a large factor in education and is one of the foremost obstacles to education reform. The low economic standing of Central Falls is undoubtedly having a negative impact on the learning occurring at Ella Risk, which in turn is being reflected on the standardized tests. This is not to say that low economic standing is by any means an indicator of intelligence, nor is it to say that the economy is the reason for poor performance of a school. It is to say that economics is an important factor in the education which a student receives.

Safe and Supportive Schools



Information Reported By Schools

Attendance
This School
Statewide
View Details
Attendance Rate (Elementary Schools) 2009-10
94%
94%
view details
view details

Chronic Absenteeism 2008-09
17%
16%


Incidents of Suspension (2009-2010)
This School
Statewide
View Details
Number of Incidents (Elementary Schools)
2
2914
view details
view details


Student Indicators (2009-2010)
This School
Statewide
View Details
Stability Index (Elementary Schools)
89%
87%

Mobility Index (Elementary Schools)
11%
13%


Information Reported by Students



Summary Paragraph(s)

Another important factor in education is the school environment. If students are not safe and do not feel safe, then the quality of education will decrease. The Ella Risk school had only 2 incidents of suspension in the 2009-2010 school year. This is representative of a safe school, well on top of its discipline and any disciplinarian issues. This is mirrored by the high attendance rate of 94%. Such a high attendance rate signifies that students feel comfortable going to school. The 17% of chronic absenteeism is more than likely related to another factor, such as the economics of the region, than to students or parents feeling the school is not a safe place. This parental view is also mirrored by the stability and mobility indices. Ella Risk has an 89% stability index, representing that 89% of students stay in the school from one year to the next. The school has an 11% mobility index, which represents only 11% of the student body either enters or leaves during the school year. The stability index is higher than the state average by 2% and the mobility index is lower than the state average by 2%. It is apparent that Ella Risk is considered to be a safe and supportive school (as judged by the data).

Funding and Resources



Information Reported By Schools

Tax and Spending FY2009
This District
View Details
District Property Value per Student
$196,417.72

District Tax Rate per $1000.00
$8.08

District Per Pupil Expenditure
$14,347.00

District Property Tax Capacity
$15

District Tax Effort
$189

District Median Family Income
$26,844

Information Reported by Students



Summary Paragraph(s)

It is important that the funding of Ella Risk also be taken into account. The numbers are rather confusing as the state has taken control of the school district and therefore funding is being allocated differently than other districts. An example of this can be found in the difference between the district property value per student of Central Falls compared to other towns mirrored against the per pupil expense. Central Falls has a substantially lower property value than other towns, but the per pupil expenditure is higher. This means that while the overall economic standing of the city is worse, more money is being spent educating its students than other towns. This pattern can be found comparing other elements of school funding, such as the district tax effort, or the median family income. Both are lower than many other towns, yet, Central Falls is putting more money into each pupil than more affluent towns. The explanation for this can only be found in state funding, as the tax rate is lower in Central Falls than other places, representing lower tax revenue going toward the schools.